Urban Nature Atlas for Oslo (beta version)

• Teknisk dokumentasjon: Kruse, M. et al (2021) Making urban ecosystem mapping accessible to the public: the urban nature atlas of Oslo (Norway). Reptes i oportunitats de la infraestructura verda metropolitana. Barcelona: Institut d'Estudis Regionals i Metropolitans de Barcelona 2021 ISBN 978-84-92940-49-3. s. 185-189.

Spatial targeting of green roofs in Oslo (beta version)

• Teknisk dokumentasjon: Venter et al. (2021) Interactive spatial planning of urban green infrastructure - Retrofitting green roofs where ecosystem services are most needed in Oslo. Ecosystem Services, Volume 50, 101314.

Stormwater fees for Oslo (beta version) 

• Barton et al. (2021) Brukerfinansiert klimaberedskap? En beregningsmodell for overvannsgebyr i Oslo.

Horvath, P., Barton, D.N., Hauglin, E.A. & Ellefsen, H.W. (2017). Blue-Green Factor (BGF) mapping in QGIS. User Guide and Documentation - NINA Report 1445

• Garnåsjordet, P.A. et al. (2021) Urban green. Integrating ecosystem extent and condition data in urban ecosystem accounts. Examples from the Oslo region. Statistical journal of the IAOS 37 (2021) 1247-1274.
• Hanssen et al. (2021) Utilizing LiDAR data to map tree canopy for urban ecosystem extent and condition accounts in Oslo. Ecological indicators. Volume 130, November 2021, 108007.
  
• Venter et al. (2020) Hyperlocal mapping of urban air temperature using remote sensing and crowdsourced weather data. Remote Sensing of Environment Volume 242, 1 June 2020, 111791
  

Biofysisk 

• Berglihn, E., Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2021) Ecosystem services from urban forests: the case of Oslomarka, Norway. Ecosystem Services 51 (2021) 101358.
• Venter et al. (2021) Back to nature: Norwegians sustain increased recreational use of urban green space months after the COVID-19 outbreak. Landscape and Urban Planning. Volume 214, October 2021, 104175.
• Venter et al. (2021) Interactive spatial planning of urban green infrastructure – Retrofitting green roofs where ecosystem services are most needed in Oslo. Ecosystem Services, Volume 50, 101314.
• Cimburova and Pont (2021) Location matters. A systematic review of spatial contextual factors mediating ecosystem services of urban trees. Ecosystem Services. Volume 50, August 2021, 101296

• Cimburova and Barton (2020) The potential of geospatial analysis and Bayesian networks to enable i-Tree Eco assessment of existing tree inventories. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. Volume 55, November 2020, 126801
• Venter et al. (2020) Linking green infrastructure to urban heat and human health risk mitigation in Oslo, Norway. Science of The Total Environment Volume 709 20 March 2020, 136193
• Venter et al. (2020) Urban nature in a time of crisis: recreational use of green space increases during the COVID-19 outbreak in Oslo, Norway. Environmental Research Letters
• Ellefsen, H. (Ed.)., Barton, D.N.(2019). MOT EN BLÅGRØNN EIENDOMSUTVIKLING? «Stresstesting» av Blågrønn Faktor på utvalgte case studier i Bærum Kommune. Oslo: Arkitektur og designhøgskolen i Oslo
• Hanssen, F., D.N. Barton, M. Nowell, Z. Cimburova (2019). Mapping urban tree canopy cover using airborne laser scanning – applications to urban ecosystem accounting for Oslo. NINA Report 1677. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research.
• Brastein Halvorsen, J. (2019) Characterisation and typification of urban ecosystem types. A test of the NiN system. Master Thesis, UiO Naturhistorisk Museum

Økonomisk

• Laszkiewicz, E., Heyman, A., Chen, X., Cimburova, Z., Nowell, M. & Barton, D. (2022) Valuing access to urban greenspace using non-linear distance decay in hedonic property pricing. Ecosystem Services 53 (2022).
• Stange, E., Barton, D., Andersson, E. og Haase, D. 2022. Comparing the implicit valuation of ecosystem services from nature based solutions in performance-based green area indicators across three European cities. Landscape and Urban Planning. Volume 2019, March 2022.
• Nollet, A.,Barton, D.A., Cimburova, Z., Often, A. Accounting for amenities and regulating ecosystem services of urban trees. Testing a combined field protocol for VAT19 and i-Tree Eco valuation methods. NINA Report 1948.
  
• Barton, D., Venter, Z.S., Sælthun, N.R., Furuseth, I.S. & Seifert-Dähnn (2021) Brukerfinansiert klimaberedskap? En beregningsmodell for overvannsgebyr i Oslo. Vann 4/2021.
• Cimburova and Barton (2020) The potential of geospatial analysis and Bayesian networks to enable i-Tree Eco assessment of existing tree inventories. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. Volume 55, November 2020, 126801
• Chen, W.; D.N. Barton, K. Magnussen, S. Navrud, K. Grimsrud, P.A. Garnåsjordet, E. Engelien, A. Syverhuset, T. Bekkby, E. Rinde, 2019): «Verdier i Oslofjorden: Økonomiske verdier tilknyttet økosystemtjenester fra fjorden og strandsonen». NIVA-rapport 7420-2019. (oppdrag fra Miljødirektoratet med bidrag fra URBAN EEA)
• Barton et al.(2017) Monetary valuation methods in urban ecosystem accounting  - examples of their relevance for municipal policy and planning in the Oslo metropolitan area

• Lauwers, L., Barton, D.N., Blumentrath, S. & Often, A. (2017). Accounting for urban trees. Updating the VAT03 compensation value model. NINA Report 1453. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research.
• Barton, D.N. , N. Vågnes Traaholt, S. Blumentrath (2015) Materials and methods appendix for valuation of ecosystem services of green infrastructure in Oslo.– NINA Rapport 1115.
• Barton, D.N., E. Stange, S. Blumentrath, N. Vågnes Traaholt (2015) Economic valuation of ecosystem services for policy. A pilot study on green infrastructure in Oslo. NINA Report 1114.
• Barton, D.N., Vågnes Traaholt, N. Blumentrath, S. & Reinvang, R. 2015. Naturen i Oslo er verdt milliarder. Verdsetting av urbane økosystemtjenester fra grønnstruktur. - NINA Rapport 1113.'
• Brosjyre om verdsettingsmetoder for Fremtidens Byer (openness-project.eu)

• Nytt om økosystemregnskap for byer.  URBAN EEA Fakta-ark 2018-1
• Betalingsvillighet for bedre bymiljø. Bytrær. Urban EEA Fakta-ark 2017
• Bytrær i Oslo : 28 milliarder kroner naturkapital?. Urban EEA Fakta-ark 2017
• Skjønnhetskonkurranse: Oslos Grønneste Gater. Urban EEA Fakta-ark 2017
• Økosystemregnskap for byområder i Oslo Regionen. Urban EEA Fakta-ark 2017-1
• Experimental ecosystem accounting in the Oslo Region. Urban EEA Technical Brief 2017 (2017-1)

Online Symposium 2020

• David N. Barton, NINA  Ecosystem accounting for cities (173 MB)
• Grazia Zulian, EU Joint Research Centre Urban ecosystem assessment in the EU (17 MB)
• Christian Steel, SABIMA Hvorfor trenger vi arealregnskap for klima og naturmangfold? (13 MB)
• Zander Venter, NINA Stavanger urban nature mapping (174 MB)
• Erik Stange, NINA Trondheim IMAGINE Project (37 MB)
• Isabel Seifert, NIVA Oslo New WaterWays Project (240 MB)
• David N. Barton, NINA Oslofjord Region - value of ecosystem services (188 MB)
• Karl Otto Ellefsen, AHO Urbanity, sustainability and long-term green borders (64 MB)
• Halvor Weider Ellefsen, AHO The Blue-green factor method: possible futures (327 MB)
• Per Arild Garnåsjordet, SSB Urban Green. Integrating ecosystem extent and condition as a basis for ecosystem accounts. Examples from the Oslo region (24 MB)
• Megan Nowell, NINA Can actual land cover changes be detected from space? (206 MB)
• Olav Skarpaas, NINA&NHM Modelling urban plant diversity -  the green in between(49 MB)
• Frank Hanssen, NINA Tree spotting - mapping the urban tree canopy (33 MB)
• David N. Barton, NINA Communicating ecosystem condition using an Urban Nature Atlas (48 MB)
• Zander Venter, NINA What is the health impact of urban heat island mitigation in Oslo? (128 MB)
• David N. Barton, NINA Communicating uncertainty about stormwater run-off mitigation (173 MB)
• Zofie Cimburova, NINA Public tree visibility index - seeing the city for the trees (307 MB)
• David N. Barton, NINA What is the natural capital value of urban trees in Oslo?(247 MB)

URBAN EEA Symposium 17 September 2018

URBAN EEA intro & overview (2017)